Thread: Postgresql Installation -- Red Hat vs OpenSUSE vs Ubuntu
Forgive my ignorance, but I'm new to PostgreSQL. Regarding installation, I'm trying to understand some of the differences between Red Hat, Ubuntu, and OpenSUSE. My goal is to set up a self-contained lab instance for learning on each distribution. So, I assume I'll need both the client and server on each, right? From www.postgresql.org, the "most common and important packages" for these distributions and their installation instructions are as follows:
Red Hat: http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/
yum install postgresql-server postgresql-client postgresql-contrib postgresql-devel pgadmin3
Ubuntu: http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/ubuntu/
apt-get postgresql-client-9.4 postgresql-9.4 postgresql-contrib-9.4 libpq-dev postgresql-server-dev-9.4 pgadmin3
yum install postgresql-server postgresql-client postgresql-contrib postgresql-devel pgadmin3
Ubuntu: http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/ubuntu/
apt-get postgresql-client-9.4 postgresql-9.4 postgresql-contrib-9.4 libpq-dev postgresql-server-dev-9.4 pgadmin3
Unlike the postgresql.org webpages for Red Hat and Ubuntu, the OpenSUSE webpage, doesn't provide a list of the "most common and important" packages to get postgresql up and running. Instead, it refers me to this webpage:
That webpage list a lot of postgresql package groups (with sub-packages). Are the postgresql packages that are included in the default OpenSUSE repositories the group of packages displayed as "postgesql" near the upper-left corner of that webpage? If so, why doesn't the http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/suse/ webpage list the "most common and important" packaged like the http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/ and http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/ubuntu/ webpages? The http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/suse/ webpage is not very user friendly for new users.
Also, are the following equivalent?
Red Hat Ubuntu
postgresql-server postgresql-9.4
postgresql-client postgresql-client-9.4
postgresql-contrib postgresql-contrib-9.4
postgresql-devel postgresql-server-dev-9.4 libpq-dev
pgadmin3 pgadmin3
Does the Red Hat postgresql-devel package include the same programs as Ubuntu's postgresql-server-dev-9.4 and libpq-dev packages?
What would be the OpenSUSE command to install the "most common and important packages" that are equivalent to the Red Hat and Ubuntu packages listed above?
zypper install ... ?
On 10/28/2015 02:20 PM, Michael Convey wrote: > Forgive my ignorance, but I'm new to PostgreSQL. Regarding installation, > I'm trying to understand some of the differences between Red Hat, > Ubuntu, and OpenSUSE. My goal is to set up a self-contained lab instance > for learning on each distribution. So, I assume I'll need both the > client and server on each, right? From www.postgresql.org > <http://www.postgresql.org>, the "most common and important packages" > for these distributions and their installation instructions are as follows: > > Red Hat: http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/ > yum install postgresql-server postgresql-client postgresql-contrib > postgresql-devel pgadmin3 > > Ubuntu: http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/ubuntu/ > apt-get > postgresql-client-9.4 postgresql-9.4 postgresql-contrib-9.4 libpq-dev postgresql-server-dev-9.4 pgadmin3 > > OpenSUSE: http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/suse/ > Unlike the postgresql.org <http://postgresql.org> webpages for Red Hat > and Ubuntu, the OpenSUSE webpage, doesn't provide a list of the "most > common and important" packages to get postgresql up and running. > Instead, it refers me to this webpage: > > https://software.opensuse.org/search?q=postgresql&baseproject=openSUSE%3A13.2&search_devel=false&search_unsupported=false > > That webpage list a lot of postgresql package groups (with > sub-packages). Are the postgresql packages that are included in the > default OpenSUSE repositories the group of packages displayed as > "postgesql" near the upper-left corner of that webpage? If so, why See my answer further below. > doesn't the http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/suse/ webpage list > the "most common and important" packaged like the > http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/ and > http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/ubuntu/ webpages? The > http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/suse/ webpage is not very user > friendly for new users. > > Also, are the following equivalent? > > Red Hat Ubuntu > postgresql-server postgresql-9.4 > postgresql-client postgresql-client-9.4 > postgresql-contrib postgresql-contrib-9.4 > postgresql-devel postgresql-server-dev-9.4 libpq-dev > pgadmin3 pgadmin3 The RH family(CentOS/SL/Fedora) version is going to determine the actual Postgres version for the default repos. So what the package provides is going to be roughly equivalent, it just may not be 9.4. See below for the mapping: http://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/ If you install from the Postgres yum repos then you will have more choice of versions. > > Does the Red Hat postgresql-devel package include the same programs as > Ubuntu's postgresql-server-dev-9.4 and libpq-dev packages? I would say yes. Once the packages are installed use the appropriate package manager to take a look. > > What would be the OpenSUSE command to install the "most common and > important packages" that are equivalent to the Red Hat and Ubuntu > packages listed above? > > zypper install ... ? You could do: zypper search postgresql That will show whatever is the default for the SuSE version you are on. On my openSUSE 13.2 machine that is Postgres 9.3 something. If you go to the Open Build Service search link shown above and search on Postgresql there is 9.4 available. Since it is not the version pegged to the SuSE release you will need to click the 'Show unstable packages' to show it. Click the 1 Click Install link and it will add the repo to your zypper repos in /etc/zypp. Basically, you will be using the server:database:postgresql repo instead of the SuSE version repo. Then you can run zypper refresh and install the version you want. SuSE uses RPMs so the package names and their functions are almost identical to the RH naming. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com