Thread: good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment in Postrgesql 9
good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment in Postrgesql 9
From
AI Rumman
Date:
I am going to install Postgresql 9.0 for my running applicaiton which is at 8.1.
My Db size is 3 GB.
Server Specification:
dual-core 4 cpu
RAM: 32 GB
OS: Centos
What will be good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment and etc.
Any help please.
Re: good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment in Postrgesql 9
From
tuanhoanganh
Date:
I have same question
My Computer is running POS with Postgres 8.9.11 database
Ram : 16GB
OS : Windows 2008 R2
CPU XEON 2G
User : 50-60 user (connect ~ 200 connects, I increase Windows SharedSection=1024,20480,1024 for > 125 connects).
DISK : RAID 1
What will be good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment and etc.
My application run slowly when >= 30 users
Thank for your help.
Tuan Hoang Anh
My Computer is running POS with Postgres 8.9.11 database
Ram : 16GB
OS : Windows 2008 R2
CPU XEON 2G
User : 50-60 user (connect ~ 200 connects, I increase Windows SharedSection=1024,20480,1024 for > 125 connects).
DISK : RAID 1
What will be good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment and etc.
Thank for your help.
Tuan Hoang Anh
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:59 PM, AI Rumman <rummandba@gmail.com> wrote:
I am going to install Postgresql 9.0 for my running applicaiton which is at 8.1.My Db size is 3 GB.Server Specification:dual-core 4 cpuRAM: 32 GBOS: CentosWhat will be good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment and etc.Any help please.
Re: good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment in Postrgesql 9
From
Vick Khera
Date:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:59 AM, AI Rumman <rummandba@gmail.com> wrote: > Server Specification: > dual-core 4 cpu > RAM: 32 GB > OS: Centos > What will be good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, > checkpoint_segment and etc. I'll take this one ... :) On my 24GB quad-core Opteron servers running FreeBSD 8.1, with big external fibre connected RAID array, I use the following changes relative to the default 9.0.1 postgresql.conf. You probably don't need to adjust the prepared transactions setting, unless you use them :-) The default config is pretty darned good, compared to what used to ship with older releases like 8.1 :) listen_addresses = '*' max_connections = 200 shared_buffers = 4200MB max_prepared_transactions = 100 # guideline: same number as max_connections work_mem = 512MB maintenance_work_mem = 1024MB vacuum_cost_delay = 15 checkpoint_segments = 64 checkpoint_timeout = 15min checkpoint_completion_target = 0.8 random_page_cost = 1.3 # fast disk with big buffer effective_cache_size = 6400MB # shared_buffers + `sysctl -n vfs.hibufspace` / 8192 (BLKSZ) log_checkpoints = on update_process_title = on log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0
Re: good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment in Postrgesql 9
From
Vick Khera
Date:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:30 AM, tuanhoanganh <hatuan05@gmail.com> wrote: > My Computer is running POS with Postgres 8.9.11 database > Ram : 16GB > OS : Windows 2008 R2 > CPU XEON 2G > User : 50-60 user (connect ~ 200 connects, I increase Windows > SharedSection=1024,20480,1024 for > 125 connects). > DISK : RAID 1 > What will be good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, > checkpoint_segment and etc. > My application run slowly when >= 30 users I'd start by optimizing your queries, and looking for both extra and missing indexes that would help your queries. What kind of disk do you have? Are these just local SATA drives? Perhaps you need faster drives.
Re: good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment in Postrgesql 9
From
tv@fuzzy.cz
Date:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:30 AM, tuanhoanganh <hatuan05@gmail.com> wrote: >> My Computer is running POS with Postgres 8.9.11 database Not sure which version is that. There's nothing like 8.9.11 ... >> Ram : 16GB >> OS : Windows 2008 R2 >> CPU XEON 2G >> User : 50-60 user (connect ~ 200 connects, I increase Windows >> SharedSection=1024,20480,1024 for > 125 connects). >> DISK : RAID 1 >> What will be good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, >> checkpoint_segment and etc. >> My application run slowly when >= 30 users > > I'd start by optimizing your queries, and looking for both extra and > missing indexes that would help your queries. Well, it's always useful to have a decent settings (default one is very conservative and may significantly hurt performance in some cases). Anyway, on Linux I'd bump up shared buffers (to something like 512MB) and work_mem (maybe 4MB), increased effective_cache_size (to about 10GB), etc. But he mentions Windows 2008 and I have no experience with running PG on this OS. > What kind of disk do you have? Are these just local SATA drives? > Perhaps you need faster drives. I think it's too early to recommend buying faster drives. You have not identified the bottleneck and what's causing it. regards Tomas
Re: good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment in Postrgesql 9
From
David Fetter
Date:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:30:16AM -0500, Vick Khera wrote: > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 2:59 AM, AI Rumman <rummandba@gmail.com> wrote: > > Server Specification: > > dual-core 4 cpu > > RAM: 32 GB > > OS: Centos > > What will be good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, > > checkpoint_segment and etc. > > I'll take this one ... :) On my 24GB quad-core Opteron servers > running FreeBSD 8.1, with big external fibre connected RAID array, I > use the following changes relative to the default 9.0.1 > postgresql.conf. You probably don't need to adjust the prepared > transactions setting, unless you use them :-) > > The default config is pretty darned good, compared to what used to > ship with older releases like 8.1 :) > > listen_addresses = '*' > max_connections = 200 > shared_buffers = 4200MB > max_prepared_transactions = 100 # guideline: same number as max_connections This should be either 0 (no 2PC) or the bounded from below by max_connections. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re: good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment in Postrgesql 9
From
Vick Khera
Date:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:45 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote: >> max_prepared_transactions = 100 # guideline: same number as max_connections > > This should be either 0 (no 2PC) or the bounded from below by > max_connections. > In general, sure. I have one app that uses 2PC, and it makes maybe 2% of the connections, so it is pointless to have it set very high. If it were fatal, I'd hope Pg would enforce it with at least a warning.