Re: good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment in Postrgesql 9 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vick Khera
Subject Re: good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment in Postrgesql 9
Date
Msg-id AANLkTi=m-tsP8Jq3xWtcpOhA5yXw_V+weZmGVU-PxtiY@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment in Postrgesql 9  (tuanhoanganh <hatuan05@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment in Postrgesql 9  (tv@fuzzy.cz)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:30 AM, tuanhoanganh <hatuan05@gmail.com> wrote:
> My Computer is running POS with Postgres 8.9.11 database
>  Ram : 16GB
>  OS : Windows 2008 R2
>  CPU XEON 2G
>  User : 50-60 user (connect ~ 200 connects, I increase Windows
> SharedSection=1024,20480,1024 for > 125 connects).
>  DISK : RAID 1
> What will be good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers,
> checkpoint_segment and etc.
> My application run slowly when >= 30 users

I'd start by optimizing your queries, and looking for both extra and
missing indexes that would help your queries.

What kind of disk do you have? Are these just local SATA drives?
Perhaps you need faster drives.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Vick Khera
Date:
Subject: Re: good settings for DB parameters such as shared_buffers, checkpoint_segment in Postrgesql 9
Next
From: Vick Khera
Date:
Subject: Re: Considering Solid State Drives