Thread: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
> It's really noone's business why any of us dislike it.  My reasons may
> or may not be different than yours which may/may not be different from
> Marc's, and so on.  Why try to summarize everyone's feelings when it's
> unnecessary.  My statement never said that we just don't like it, it
> was clear that many of the developers were uncomfortable with its
> restrictions.  Break it down.  What are "many of the developers"
> uncomfortable with?  The GPL's restrictions.  What's not clear about
> that?  It didn't say "many of the developers just don't like it", that
> would border on confrontational.  You're not going to change the minds
> of those that favor GPL just as you're not going to change the minds
> of those that prefer BSD.

Isn't it the restrictions on proprietary use that we dislike?  Seems we
should say that in there.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From
"Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
I think, and Vince can correct me if I'm wrong, but Vince is pointing out
the whole 'Many of the Developers' thing ... if we are (or at least appear
to be) unanimous in this, then there is nothing to discuss ... if "Many of
the developers' are uncomfortable, then obviously there are ones out there
that aren't, and that is where the whole "confrontation" I think arises
...

Why does this discussion get started over and over again?  Because one
person brings it up, and those in favor of GPL generally pop up
thereafter, and it just goes around ...

if we get rid of 'the Many' part, then you are saying "thi sis the way it
is, this is the way it stays, no discussion" ...

On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > It's really noone's business why any of us dislike it.  My reasons may
> > or may not be different than yours which may/may not be different from
> > Marc's, and so on.  Why try to summarize everyone's feelings when it's
> > unnecessary.  My statement never said that we just don't like it, it
> > was clear that many of the developers were uncomfortable with its
> > restrictions.  Break it down.  What are "many of the developers"
> > uncomfortable with?  The GPL's restrictions.  What's not clear about
> > that?  It didn't say "many of the developers just don't like it", that
> > would border on confrontational.  You're not going to change the minds
> > of those that favor GPL just as you're not going to change the minds
> > of those that prefer BSD.
>
> Isn't it the restrictions on proprietary use that we dislike?  Seems we
> should say that in there.
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>


Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> I think, and Vince can correct me if I'm wrong, but Vince is pointing out
> the whole 'Many of the Developers' thing ... if we are (or at least appear
> to be) unanimous in this, then there is nothing to discuss ... if "Many of
> the developers' are uncomfortable, then obviously there are ones out there
> that aren't, and that is where the whole "confrontation" I think arises
> ...
>
> Why does this discussion get started over and over again?  Because one
> person brings it up, and those in favor of GPL generally pop up
> thereafter, and it just goes around ...
>
> if we get rid of 'the Many' part, then you are saying "thi sis the way it
> is, this is the way it stays, no discussion" ...

But Vince's text is below.  It starts with "Many".  I merely grafted his
text after my opening text:

Many PostgreSQL developers past and present are uncomfortable with
restrictions imposed by the GPL.  The PostgreSQL project always has
and will continue to remain under the BSD license alone.


--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From
Vince Vielhaber
Date:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > It's really noone's business why any of us dislike it.  My reasons may
> > or may not be different than yours which may/may not be different from
> > Marc's, and so on.  Why try to summarize everyone's feelings when it's
> > unnecessary.  My statement never said that we just don't like it, it
> > was clear that many of the developers were uncomfortable with its
> > restrictions.  Break it down.  What are "many of the developers"
> > uncomfortable with?  The GPL's restrictions.  What's not clear about
> > that?  It didn't say "many of the developers just don't like it", that
> > would border on confrontational.  You're not going to change the minds
> > of those that favor GPL just as you're not going to change the minds
> > of those that prefer BSD.
>
> Isn't it the restrictions on proprietary use that we dislike?  Seems we
> should say that in there.

Define we.  Are you sure that that's *everyone's* dislike?  Are you
sure there aren't other reasons - Tom mentioned it's viral nature
for one thing, which happens to be one of my dislikes but it's not
the only one.  Say that restriction was changed in the GPL, would
you then want to change PostgreSQL to GPL?  You might, but I doubt
everyone would (and I'm sure Marc wouldn't).

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH    email: vev@michvhf.com    http://www.pop4.net
         56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
        Online Campground Directory    http://www.camping-usa.com
       Online Giftshop Superstore    http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================




Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From
Vince Vielhaber
Date:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

>
> I think, and Vince can correct me if I'm wrong, but Vince is pointing out
> the whole 'Many of the Developers' thing ... if we are (or at least appear
> to be) unanimous in this, then there is nothing to discuss ... if "Many of
> the developers' are uncomfortable, then obviously there are ones out there
> that aren't, and that is where the whole "confrontation" I think arises
> ...
>
> Why does this discussion get started over and over again?  Because one
> person brings it up, and those in favor of GPL generally pop up
> thereafter, and it just goes around ...
>
> if we get rid of 'the Many' part, then you are saying "thi sis the way it
> is, this is the way it stays, no discussion" ...

I pondered "many".  You can remove it if you wish, but you then paint
all contributers with the same brush and I don't think that's true.
Some being uncomfortable and some not is (imnsho) not confrontational
at all, it merely states fact.  If anything should be changed, it's the
word "uncomfortable" is the whimpy one, but it's less confrontational
than dislike, hate, etc.

>
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > It's really noone's business why any of us dislike it.  My reasons may
> > > or may not be different than yours which may/may not be different from
> > > Marc's, and so on.  Why try to summarize everyone's feelings when it's
> > > unnecessary.  My statement never said that we just don't like it, it
> > > was clear that many of the developers were uncomfortable with its
> > > restrictions.  Break it down.  What are "many of the developers"
> > > uncomfortable with?  The GPL's restrictions.  What's not clear about
> > > that?  It didn't say "many of the developers just don't like it", that
> > > would border on confrontational.  You're not going to change the minds
> > > of those that favor GPL just as you're not going to change the minds
> > > of those that prefer BSD.
> >
> > Isn't it the restrictions on proprietary use that we dislike?  Seems we
> > should say that in there.
> >
> > --
> >   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
> >   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
> >   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
> >   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
> >
>
>


Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH    email: vev@michvhf.com    http://www.pop4.net
         56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
        Online Campground Directory    http://www.camping-usa.com
       Online Giftshop Superstore    http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================