Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

1 February 2005

• 00:35   Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Tom Lane
• 06:43   Index Slowing Insert >50x Trevor Ball
• 06:43   Very important choice Lago, Bruno Almeida do
• 07:52   Re: Automagic tuning Jim C. Nasby
• 07:56   Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Jim C. Nasby
• 08:06   Re: Automagic tuning Tom Lane
• 08:29   Re: Index Slowing Insert >50x Tom Lane
• 09:06   Re: Automagic tuning Jim C. Nasby
• 09:27   Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Cosimo Streppone
• 09:35   Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Cosimo Streppone
• 11:51   Re: Very important choice Richard Huxton
• 12:14   Re: [SQL] OFFSET impact on Performance??? PFC
• 13:01   Very important choice Bruno Almeida do Lago
• 14:27   Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Jim C. Nasby
• 15:41   Performance of count(*) on large tables vs SQL Server Andrew Mayo
• 16:01   Re: Performance of count(*) on large tables vs SQL Server Shridhar Daithankar
• 16:19   Re: Performance of count(*) on large tables vs SQL Server Stef
• 16:34   Re: Performance of count(*) on large tables vs SQL Server PFC
• 16:58   Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Alex Turner
• 18:31   Re: High end server and storage for a PostgreSQL OLTP system Merlin Moncure
• 21:55   Why the difference in query plan and performance pg 7.4.6? Joost Kraaijeveld
• 23:07   Re: Why the difference in query plan and performance pg John Arbash Meinel