Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

19 October 2004

• 00:36   Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Jan Wieck
• 00:59   Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... Josh Berkus
• 01:03   Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) Tom Lane
• 01:19   Autotuning of shared buffer size (was: Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...)) Jan Wieck
• 04:02   Re: Indexes performance Tom Lane
• 11:25   Re: Queries slow using stored procedures Alban Medici (NetCentrex)
• 19:15   Why isn't this index being used? Knutsen, Mark
• 19:28   Re: Why isn't this index being used? Doug Y
• 19:34   Re: Why isn't this index being used? Knutsen, Mark
• 19:38   Vacuum takes a really long time, vacuum full required Max Baker
• 19:44   Re: Vacuum takes a really long time, vacuum full required Rod Taylor
• 19:47   Re: Why isn't this index being used? Andrew Sullivan
• 20:21   Re: Vacuum takes a really long time, vacuum full required Tom Lane
• 20:27   Index not used in query. Why? Andrei Bintintan
• 20:53   Re: Index not used in query. Why? Tom Lane
• 22:12   Re: Vacuum takes a really long time, vacuum full required Max Baker
• 22:43   Re: Free PostgreSQL Training, Philadelphia, Oct 30 Max Baker
• 23:35   Speeding up this function Matt Nuzum
• 23:49   Re: Speeding up this function Jeremy Dunn
• 23:55   Re: Speeding up this function Matt Nuzum