Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

10 May 2019

• 00:07   Re: reloption to prevent VACUUM from truncating empty pages at theend of relation Bruce Momjian
• 00:52   Re: pg12 release notes Thomas Munro
• 00:59   Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use" Tom Lane
• 01:32   Re: _bt_split(), and the risk of OOM before its critical section Peter Geoghegan
• 01:47   Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use" Tom Lane
• 02:20   Re: Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY Michael Paquier
• 02:35   Re: pg12 release notes Bruce Momjian
• 03:08   Re: pg12 release notes Bruce Momjian
• 03:13   Re: pg12 release notes Justin Pryzby
• 03:14   Re: Problems with pg_upgrade and extensions referencing catalogtables/views Bruce Momjian
• 03:19   Re: pg12 release notes Justin Pryzby
• 03:36   Re: copy-past-o comment in lock.h Michael Paquier
• 03:38   Re: pg12 release notes Bruce Momjian
• 03:52   Re: any suggestions to detect memory corruption Alex
• 04:02   Re: pg12 release notes Bruce Momjian
• 04:34   Re: pg12 release notes Justin Pryzby
• 05:10   Re: pg12 release notes Peter Geoghegan
• 06:18   Re: pg12 release notes David Rowley
• 06:34   Re: pg12 release notes David Rowley
• 06:45   Re: pg12 release notes Tom Lane
• 06:45   Re: pg12 release notes Amit Langote
• 06:57   Re: pg12 release notes David Rowley
• 07:02   Re: pg12 release notes Tom Lane
• 07:52   Re: pg12 release notes Justin Pryzby
• 07:57   Re: pg12 release notes Justin Pryzby
• 08:10   Re: pg12 release notes David Rowley
• 08:51   Re: pg12 release notes David Rowley
• 08:59   Re: pg12 release notes Amit Langote
• 09:18   Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs Thomas Munro
• 10:22   Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use" Noah Misch
• 10:47   Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid Noah Misch
• 12:02   Bug in reindexdb's error reporting Julien Rouhaud
• 12:19   Multivariate MCV stats can leak data to unprivileged users Dean Rasheed
• 13:24   Re: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting Michael Paquier
• 13:38   Re: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting Daniel Gustafsson
• 13:46   Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs Kuntal Ghosh
• 14:42   Regarding GSoD DHRUVI VADALIA
• 14:53   Re: Fwd: Add tablespace tap test to pg_rewind Michael Paquier
• 15:03   Re: vacuumdb and new VACUUM options Julien Rouhaud
• 16:59   Re: pg12 release notes Alvaro Herrera
• 17:18   Re: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting Alvaro Herrera
• 17:18   Re: pg12 release notes Tom Lane
• 17:20   att_isnull Robert Haas
• 17:34   Re: att_isnull Alvaro Herrera
• 17:43   Re: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting Tom Lane
• 17:46   Re: att_isnull Tom Lane
• 17:55   Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use" Tom Lane
• 18:18   Re: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting Julien Rouhaud
• 18:33   Re: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting Alvaro Herrera
• 18:38   Re: Why is infinite_recurse test suddenly failing? Tom Lane
• 18:58   Re: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting Julien Rouhaud
• 20:43   Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names Ashwin Agrawal
• 20:51   Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names Andres Freund
• 21:06   Re: What's the point of allow_system_table_mods? Andres Freund
• 21:27   Re: Why is infinite_recurse test suddenly failing? Andres Freund
• 21:51   Re: What's the point of allow_system_table_mods? Andrew Gierth
• 22:00   Re: What's the point of allow_system_table_mods? Tom Lane
• 22:16   Re: What's the point of allow_system_table_mods? Andres Freund
• 22:19   Re: What's the point of allow_system_table_mods? Andres Freund
• 22:35   Re: Why is infinite_recurse test suddenly failing? Tom Lane
• 22:43   Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names Ashwin Agrawal
• 22:48   Re: What's the point of allow_system_table_mods? Tom Lane
• 22:50   Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names Andres Freund
• 23:09   Re: What's the point of allow_system_table_mods? Andres Freund
• 23:11   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6 Andres Freund
• 23:18   Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names Alvaro Herrera
• 23:26   Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names Andres Freund
• 23:28   Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names Tom Lane
• 23:29   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 Tom Lane
• 23:46   Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use" Tom Lane