Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashwin Agrawal
Subject Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names
Date
Msg-id CALfoeis1efGPnMn_eiVuiDk-_O0dgTV-6nnEbJL0tZ7mjL=kAQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:52 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> The changes necessary for tableam were already huge. Changing naming
> schemes for functions that are used all over the backend (e.g. ~80 calls
> to table_beginscan), and where there's other wrapper functions that also
> widely used (237 calls to systable_beginscan) which didn't have to be
> touched, at the same time would have made it even harder to review.

If there are no objections to renaming now, as separate independent
patch, I am happy to do the same and send it across. Will rename to
make it consistent as mentioned at start of the thread leaving
table_relation_xxx() ones as is today.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Inconsistency between table am callback and table function names