Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

2 May 2019

• 00:00   Re: [HACKERS] Commits 8de72b and 5457a1 (COPY FREEZE) Tom Lane
• 00:49   Re: to_timestamp docs Alexander Korotkov
• 01:02   Re: to_timestamp docs Bruce Momjian
• 01:03   Re: to_timestamp docs Arthur Zakirov
• 02:01   Re: [HACKERS] Commits 8de72b and 5457a1 (COPY FREEZE) Tom Lane
• 02:41   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 Tom Lane
• 03:57   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL David Rowley
• 04:07   Re: PostgreSQL Asian language support for full text search usingICU (and also updating pg_trgm) Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:08   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL Tom Lane
• 04:25   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6 Andres Freund
• 05:01   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 Tom Lane
• 05:06   Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch John Naylor
• 05:19   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6 Andres Freund
• 05:22   Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL David Rowley
• 06:24   Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch Amit Kapila
• 06:46   Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch Amit Kapila
• 07:00   Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs Dilip Kumar
• 09:31   Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch Amit Kapila
• 10:09   Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch John Naylor
• 10:37   Re: Failure in contrib test _int on loach Heikki Linnakangas
• 11:06   Re: How to estimate the shared memory size required for parallel scan? Thomas Munro
• 11:44   Re: Heap lock levels for REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY not quite right? Peter Eisentraut
• 11:56   Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch Amit Kapila
• 12:04   Volatile function weirdness Vik Fearing
• 12:11   Re: Volatile function weirdness Julien Rouhaud
• 12:32   Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs Dilip Kumar
• 12:33   Re: speeding up planning with partitions Amit Langote
• 13:30   Fixing order of resowner cleanup in 12, for Windows Thomas Munro
• 15:35   Re: walsender vs. XLogBackgroundFlush during shutdown Tomas Vondra
• 15:40   Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds Laurenz Albe
• 15:49   Re: Bad canonicalization for dateranges with 'infinity' bounds Laurenz Albe
• 16:30   Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs Robert Haas
• 16:55   Re: pgbench - add option to show actual builtin script code Ibrar Ahmed
• 17:00   Re: walsender vs. XLogBackgroundFlush during shutdown Simon Riggs
• 17:06   Inconsistent error message wording for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY Tom Lane
• 17:15   Re: Fixing order of resowner cleanup in 12, for Windows Tom Lane
• 17:20   Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing Robert Haas
• 17:25   Re: pgbench - add option to show actual builtin script code Fabien COELHO
• 17:28   Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing Andres Freund
• 17:33   Re: Heap lock levels for REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY not quite right? Andres Freund
• 17:49   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 Tom Lane
• 17:50   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6 Andres Freund
• 17:54   Re: pgbench - add option to show actual builtin script code Ibrar Ahmed
• 18:02   Why is infinite_recurse test suddenly failing? Tom Lane
• 18:08   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 Tom Lane
• 18:09   Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing Robert Haas
• 18:31   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6 Andres Freund
• 18:32   Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing Andres Freund
• 18:38   Re: Why is infinite_recurse test suddenly failing? Andres Freund
• 18:41   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 Tom Lane
• 18:45   Re: Why is infinite_recurse test suddenly failing? Tom Lane
• 18:56   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6 Andres Freund
• 18:57   Re: pg_upgrade --clone error checking Peter Eisentraut
• 19:02   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 Tom Lane
• 19:02   Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing Robert Haas
• 19:03   Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing Alvaro Herrera
• 19:17   Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page Antonin Houska
• 19:24   Re: pg_upgrade --clone error checking Jeff Janes
• 19:28   Re: pg_upgrade --clone error checking Alvaro Herrera
• 19:35   Re: pgbench - add option to show actual builtin script code Fabien COELHO
• 19:59   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 Tom Lane
• 20:28   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6 Andres Freund
• 21:03   Re: pg_upgrade --clone error checking Jeff Janes
• 21:06   Re: How to estimate the shared memory size required for parallel scan? Thomas Munro
• 22:38   Re: ERROR: failed to add item to the index page Peter Geoghegan
• 22:41   Re: ERROR: failed to add item to the index page Andreas Joseph Krogh
• 23:16   Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing Alvaro Herrera
• 23:39   Re: Heap lock levels for REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY not quite right? Peter Eisentraut
• 23:42   Re: Heap lock levels for REINDEX INDEX CONCURRENTLY not quite right? Andres Freund
• 23:43   Re: Identity columns should own only one sequence Peter Eisentraut
• 23:54   Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6 Tom Lane