Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid
Date
Msg-id 20190510074703.GB1098093@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 10:10:35PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 3:30 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I put the second sentence back and tweaked it thus: s/fails/might
> > fail/.  Maybe I'm being too pedantic here, but binding to 127.0.0.2
> > works on other OSes too, as long as you've configured an interface or
> > alias for it (and it's not terribly uncommon to do so).

Even if, say, 99% of FreeBSD systems did configure such an interface, that
would not be enough to make it okay to probe 127.0.0.2 on FreeBSD.

> Pushed, with a further adjustment to the comment.

I'm fine with what you committed.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use"
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Bug in reindexdb's error reporting