Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

13 January 2016

• 00:11   Re: WIP: Rework access method interface Alvaro Herrera
• 01:12   Re: bootstrap pg_shseclabel in relcache initialization Adam Brightwell
• 01:13   Re: bootstrap pg_shseclabel in relcache initialization Adam Brightwell
• 01:13   Re: pg_dump dumps event triggers and transforms unconditionally Tom Lane
• 01:18   Re: WIP: Rework access method interface Tom Lane
• 01:32   Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff Alvaro Herrera
• 01:32   blocking the alter role command JotaComm
• 01:39   Re: blocking the alter role command Fabrízio de Royes Mello
• 01:44   Weird behavior during CREATE EXTENSION Jim Nasby
• 02:00   Re: Weird behavior during CREATE EXTENSION Tom Lane
• 03:20   Re: pg_dump and premature optimizations for objects not to be dumped Tom Lane
• 04:23   PGCon 2016 CFP - one week left Dan Langille
• 04:27   Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. David Rowley
• 04:47   Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. David Rowley
• 05:46   Re: Some bugs in psql_complete of psql Peter Eisentraut
• 06:17   Re: checkpointer continuous flushing Amit Kapila
• 09:17   Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker. Amit Langote
• 11:19   Re: ExecGather() + nworkers Amit Kapila
• 13:44   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov
• 15:56   Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Anastasia Lubennikova
• 16:13   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Pavel Stehule
• 16:27   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov
• 16:28   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Marko Tiikkaja
• 16:28   Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions Fabien COELHO
• 16:30   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Marko Tiikkaja
• 16:36   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov
• 16:37   Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff Fabien COELHO
• 16:47   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Marko Tiikkaja
• 16:58   Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. Anastasia Lubennikova
• 17:02   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov
• 17:12   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Andres Freund
• 17:25   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Chapman Flack
• 17:26   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov
• 17:33   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Marko Tiikkaja
• 17:34   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov
• 17:35   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Andres Freund
• 17:36   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Marko Tiikkaja
• 17:38   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov
• 17:43   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Andres Freund
• 17:48   pgindent-polluted commits Noah Misch
• 17:49   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov
• 18:18   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov
• 18:18   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Albe Laurenz
• 18:22   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov
• 18:35   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Pavel Stehule
• 18:44   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Pavel Stehule
• 18:47   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Tom Lane
• 18:58   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov
• 19:12   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov
• 19:24   Re: pg_dump and premature optimizations for objects not to be dumped Tom Lane
• 19:46   Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Pavel Stehule
• 19:46   Python 3.x versus PG 9.1 branch Tom Lane
• 19:54   Re: pgindent-polluted commits Simon Riggs
• 20:13   Re: pgindent-polluted commits Tom Lane
• 21:40   Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport Jim Nasby
• 22:07   Re: pgindent-polluted commits Mark Dilger
• 22:14   Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension Jeff Janes
• 22:16   Re: Weird behavior during CREATE EXTENSION Jim Nasby
• 22:24   Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. David Rowley
• 23:03   Re: pgindent-polluted commits Peter Geoghegan
• 23:06   Re: pg_dump and premature optimizations for objects not to be dumped Tom Lane
• 23:37   Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension Tom Lane