Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vladimir Sitnikov
Subject Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102
Date
Msg-id CAB=Je-E-Bm+d-nPJJijWbDkPSBYvDa=+rqxk5-zjMS=Xtk9SJg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Responses Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>A value of -1 could disable generic plans

I do not like the idea.

I've seen dramatic performance improvements from using cached plans.
The numbers are like "20ms to plan vs 1ms to execute" for an often
used OLTP query. Query text is involved (~5-10KiB).

Vladimir



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Albe Laurenz
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102