Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vladimir Sitnikov
Subject Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102
Date
Msg-id CAB=Je-FrTD=M3hMY2qcE8o-tSUpqnkHEwLpY2p-PkJSZS7+yxQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102  (Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>)
Responses Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
>so you don't get to (or want to) have any control over the underlying prepared statement.

That is pl/pgsql's problem, isn't it?
In the mean time, user can use different query texts (e.g. by adding
offset 0, offset 0*1, offset 0*2, etc kind of stuff they typically use
to tune queries) to convince plpgsql to use different statement ids.

Vladimir



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marko Tiikkaja
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102