Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

31 August 2006

• 00:03   Re: Coding style for emacs Joshua D. Drake
• 00:33   Re: [PATCHES] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) Bruce Momjian
• 01:49   Re: Coding style for emacs Alvaro Herrera
• 02:17   Is this getting through? Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:37   Re: stats test on Windows is now failing repeatably? ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 03:03   Re: Is this getting through? Joshua D. Drake
• 03:50   Re: [PATCHES] Performance testing of COPY (SELECT) TO Zoltan Boszormenyi
• 05:54   Re: Is this getting through? Teodor Sigaev
• 06:50   Re: [PATCHES] Backend SSL configuration enhancement Victor B. Wagner
• 07:26   Re: [PATCHES] Backend SSL configuration enhancement Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 07:52   Re: [PATCHES] Backend SSL configuration enhancement Gregory Stark
• 08:12   Re: [PATCHES] Backend SSL configuration enhancement Victor B. Wagner
• 08:32   Re: [PATCHES] Updatable views Peter Eisentraut
• 08:34   Re: [PATCHES] Backend SSL configuration enhancement Peter Eisentraut
• 09:02   Re: [PATCHES] Updatable views Bernd Helmle
• 09:20   Re: [PATCHES] Backend SSL configuration enhancement Victor B. Wagner
• 09:48   Re: GIN FailedAssertions on Itanium2 with Intel compiler Teodor Sigaev
• 12:01   Prepared statements considered harmful Peter Eisentraut
• 12:09   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:11   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Csaba Nagy
• 12:27   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 12:33   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Peter Eisentraut
• 12:48   Re: GIN FailedAssertions on Itanium2 with Intel compiler Teodor Sigaev
• 12:55   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Csaba Nagy
• 13:05   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Merlin Moncure
• 13:06   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful zhou bo
• 13:08   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Jeroen T. Vermeulen
• 13:25   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Andreas Pflug
• 13:27   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Peter Eisentraut
• 13:32   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 13:32   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Peter Eisentraut
• 13:34   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Peter Eisentraut
• 13:36   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Peter Eisentraut
• 13:37   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Andreas Pflug
• 13:43   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Csaba Nagy
• 13:50   GUC settings with units broken? stark
• 13:52   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Peter Eisentraut
• 13:56   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Csaba Nagy
• 13:59   Re: [PATCHES] Updatable views Tom Lane
• 14:23   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful AgentM
• 14:34   gBorg status? Chris Browne
• 14:35   Re: [PATCHES] Updatable views Peter Eisentraut
• 14:41   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Phil Frost
• 14:42   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Peter Eisentraut
• 14:50   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Theo Schlossnagle
• 14:53   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Peter Eisentraut
• 15:11   Re: [PATCHES] Updatable views Tom Lane
• 15:11   Re: GUC settings with units broken? Peter Eisentraut
• 15:15   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Lukas Kahwe Smith
• 15:17   Re: GUC settings with units broken? Joshua D. Drake
• 15:18   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 15:27   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 15:31   Re: gBorg status? elein
• 15:33   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 15:33   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Tom Lane
• 15:39   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful AgentM
• 15:43   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Andrew Dunstan
• 15:47   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Andrew - Supernews
• 15:57   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 16:05   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Tom Lane
• 16:11   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Tom Lane
• 16:16   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Csaba Nagy
• 16:22   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful AgentM
• 16:23   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Martijn van Oosterhout
• 16:30   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Lukas Kahwe Smith
• 16:35   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Lukas Kahwe Smith
• 16:39   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Peter Eisentraut
• 17:04   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Second try committing the path changes. Chris Browne
• 17:04   Slony-I 1.1.5 binaries at pgFoundry.org Chris Browne
• 17:14   updatable views and default values Jaime Casanova
• 17:29   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:46   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Merlin Moncure
• 17:47   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Gregory Stark
• 17:47   Re: gBorg status? Magnus Hagander
• 17:51   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Second try committing the path changes. Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Peter Eisentraut
• 18:09   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Martijn van Oosterhout
• 18:10   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Second try committing the path Andrew Dunstan
• 18:16   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Andrew Dunstan
• 18:30   Re: [PATCHES] Interval aggregate regression failure Tom Lane
• 18:37   Re: [PATCHES] Backend SSL configuration enhancement Tom Lane
• 18:57   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Jeff Davis
• 19:01   Re: [PATCHES] Interval aggregate regression failure Bruce Momjian
• 19:01   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Tom Lane
• 19:14   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:17   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Martijn van Oosterhout
• 19:17   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Dave Cramer
• 19:31   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Hannu Krosing
• 19:51   Re: [PATCHES] Backend SSL configuration enhancement Victor B. Wagner
• 19:52   Re: [PATCHES] Interval aggregate regression failure Tom Lane
• 20:05   Re: [PATCHES] Interval aggregate regression failure Bruce Momjian
• 20:34   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Tom Lane
• 20:47   Win32 hard crash problem Joshua D. Drake
• 21:48   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Gregory Stark
• 21:51   Re: Win32 hard crash problem Tom Lane
• 21:51   Re: gBorg status? Chris Browne
• 21:59   Re: Win32 hard crash problem Joshua D. Drake
• 22:02   Re: Win32 hard crash problem Tom Lane
• 22:02   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Gregory Stark
• 22:10   Re: Win32 hard crash problem Joshua D. Drake
• 22:19   Re: Win32 hard crash problem Dave Cramer
• 22:29   Re: Win32 hard crash problem Alvaro Herrera
• 22:29   Re: Win32 hard crash problem Joshua D. Drake
• 22:30   Re: updatable views and default values Tom Lane
• 22:39   Re: Win32 hard crash problem Tom Lane
• 22:47   Re: Win32 hard crash problem Joshua D. Drake
• 22:56   Re: Win32 hard crash problem Joshua D. Drake
• 22:56   Re: Win32 hard crash problem Tom Lane
• 23:04   Re: Prepared statements considered harmful Gregory Stark
• 23:21   Re: Win32 hard crash problem Dave Page
• 23:56   Re: python / 7.4 / FC5 / x86_64 Tom Lane
• 23:56   Re: [PATCHES] Interval aggregate regression failure Michael Glaesemann