Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> writes:
> tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) writes:
>> No, because those derived files are not in CVS at all. What you
>> are describing sounds to me like a clock skew problem. Is your
>> machine's system clock showing the correct date?
> Odd, odd. NOT a clock problem. The .c files were sitting in my
> buildfarm's CVS repository for HEAD. And yes, indeed, the derived
> files shouldn't have been there at all. I'm not quite sure how they
> got there in the first place.
> At any rate, after comprehensively looking for yacc-derived files,
> that clears this problem, as well as regression failures with last
> night's commit of COPY (SELECT) TO, which is no bad thing.
I'll bet the way they got there is you did a build in the CVS repository
tree, and then cleaned up with "make distclean" not "make maintainer-clean".
The buildfarm script is supposed to complain about unexpected files in
the repository --- I wonder if it is fooled by the .cvsignore entries
for these files?
regards, tom lane
