Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

21 June 2005

• 00:37   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Tom Lane
• 01:08   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:04   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Josh Berkus
• 02:23   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Gavin Sherry
• 02:24   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:28   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Andrew Dunstan
• 02:32   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 02:40   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Tom Lane
• 03:38   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Josh Berkus
• 04:04   Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Bruce Momjian
• 04:10   Autovacuum Patch Status Matthew T. O'Connor
• 04:12   Escape handling in strings Bruce Momjian
• 04:12   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Tom Lane
• 04:57   Re: Escape handling in strings Oliver Jowett
• 05:44   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 06:31   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Michael Paesold
• 07:10   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Robert Treat
• 07:41   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Dave Page
• 07:49   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Dave Page
• 07:50   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Magnus Hagander
• 07:55   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 08:01   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Dave Page
• 08:16   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Dave Page
• 08:36   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication Alfranio Correia Junior
• 09:02   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Oleg Bartunov
• 09:35   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication Alfranio Correia Junior
• 11:30   GiST concurrency Teodor Sigaev
• 11:48   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Bruno Wolff III
• 11:54   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Stephen Frost
• 11:54   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints John Hansen
• 12:04   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Bruno Wolff III
• 12:11   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints John Hansen
• 12:26   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Bruno Wolff III
• 12:47   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Rod Taylor
• 12:57   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Matthew T. O'Connor
• 13:11   Re: Escape handling in strings Tom Lane
• 13:16   Re: Compiling tsearch2 on AIX Mag Gam
• 13:23   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Tom Lane
• 13:43   Re: GiST concurrency Tom Lane
• 13:43   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Robert Treat
• 13:45   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Tom Lane
• 13:56   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Tom Lane
• 14:04   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Tom Lane
• 14:07   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Stephen Frost
• 14:15   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Andrew Dunstan
• 14:32   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Tom Lane
• 14:39   Re: GiST concurrency Teodor Sigaev
• 15:27   Re: Escape handling in strings AgentM
• 15:29   Re: [GENERAL] Escape handling in strings Karl O. Pinc
• 15:32   Re: Compiling tsearch2 on AIX Tom Lane
• 15:34   Re: Escape handling in strings Tom Lane
• 15:38   Re: [GENERAL] index selection by query planner Tom Lane
• 15:44   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Robert Treat
• 16:06   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Andrew Dunstan
• 16:18   Re: Escape handling in strings Bruce Momjian
• 16:46   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Victor Y. Yegorov
• 17:05   Server instrumentation patch Bruce Momjian
• 17:17   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Josh Berkus
• 17:47   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Bruce Momjian
• 17:48   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Bruce Momjian
• 17:52   Re: PROPOSAL - User's exception in PL/pgSQL Pavel Stehule
• 18:38   PROPOSAL FE/BE extension to handle IN/OUT parameters Dave Cramer
• 18:59   Why is checkpoint so costly? Josh Berkus
• 19:56   Strange logic for partial index proving Simon Riggs
• 20:07   Space reuse and autovacuum Bruce Momjian
• 20:29   Re: Strange logic for partial index proving Tom Lane
• 21:14   Re: PROPOSAL FE/BE extension to handle IN/OUT parameters Tom Lane
• 21:16   Re: Why is checkpoint so costly? Tom Lane
• 21:23   pg_terminate_backend idea Magnus Hagander
• 21:24   Re: PROPOSAL FE/BE extension to handle IN/OUT parameters Dave Cramer
• 21:26   Re: PROPOSAL FE/BE extension to handle IN/OUT parameters Tom Lane
• 21:34   Re: Strange logic for partial index proving Simon Riggs
• 21:37   Re: Why is checkpoint so costly? Alvaro Herrera
• 21:43   Re: Why is checkpoint so costly? Josh Berkus
• 21:49   Re: PROPOSAL FE/BE extension to handle IN/OUT parameters Tom Lane
• 22:01   Re: pg_terminate_backend idea Tom Lane
• 22:17   Re: PROPOSAL - User's exception in PL/pgSQL Tom Lane
• 22:22   Re: [PATCHES] Removing Kerberos 4 Tom Lane
• 22:28   Re: Strange logic for partial index proving Jim C. Nasby
• 22:36   major, minor and micro version Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
• 22:42   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Greg Sabino Mullane
• 22:42   The contrib hit list Tom Lane
• 22:49   Re: Strange logic for partial index proving Tom Lane
• 23:18   Re: Why is checkpoint so costly? Alvaro Herrera
• 23:21   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Michael Glaesemann
• 23:22   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Michael Glaesemann
• 23:24   Re: major, minor and micro version Alvaro Herrera
• 23:29   Re: Why is checkpoint so costly? Josh Berkus
• 23:30   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Josh Berkus
• 23:47   Re: The contrib hit list Jonah H. Harris