Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
>
>>But it still requires me to send some data (such as a dummy query) to
>>the backend before it exits. This is because server side libpq blocks
>>when reading and ignores signals at this time. I believe the fix for
>>this would be to pass a flag down to the libpq routines that we want to
>>be abort in case of signal+flag, set only when doing the "main call" to
>>recv, so we can kill idle process.
>
>
> Yech! That code is messy enough already, lets not pile another kluge
> atop it in order to handle something that's not even being requested
> AFAIR.
I ran into the same problem back when I was trying to implement an
idle-in-transaction timeout, so solving this might be useful in more
than one place..
-O
