Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

29 April 1998

• 01:33   Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
• 01:41   CVSup help?? dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
• 03:04   RE: [INTERFACES] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Peter Mount
• 04:41   Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Michael Meskes
• 04:53   ANSI error messages Michael Meskes
• 07:59   Re: [HACKERS] CVSup help?? Thomas G. Lockhart
• 08:13   Re: [HACKERS] CVSup help?? The Hermit Hacker
• 09:09   Re: Bug#21681: postgresql: Doesn't allow granting to www-data John Goerzen
• 09:56   Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC Thomas G. Lockhart
• 10:28   Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Tom Lane
• 10:36   Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Tom Lane
• 10:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Tom Lane
• 12:04   RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Peter Mount
• 12:05   Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Bruce Momjian
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] ANSI error messages Michael Yount
• 14:47   Re: [HACKERS] CVSup help?? dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
• 14:50   Re: [HACKERS] CVSup help?? The Hermit Hacker
• 15:17   Re: [HACKERS] CVSup help?? Bruce Momjian
• 15:38   Re: [HACKERS] CVSup help?? dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
• 16:11   Re: [HACKERS] CVSup help?? Bruce Stephens
• 16:29   Shared libs with version numbers. darrenk@insightdist.com (Darren King)
• 17:10   Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Phil Thompson
• 18:01   Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Tom Lane
• 19:03   Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Bruce Momjian
• 20:27   Unlock the vacuum Michael Yeung
• 21:21   removing the exec() from doexec() Brett McCormickS
• 21:44   Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec() Bruce Momjian
• 21:57   Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec() Bruce Momjian
• 22:01   Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec() Brett McCormick
• 22:05   Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec() Bruce Momjian
• 22:07   Re: [PATCHES] S_LOCK reduced contention through backoff patch dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
• 22:22   Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec() The Hermit Hacker
• 22:27   data compression/encryption Brett McCormick
• 22:36   Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec() Brett McCormick
• 22:44   Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec() Bruce Momjian
• 22:51   Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec() Bruce Momjian
• 23:08   text patch -- sugg cmd when run as root Brett McCormick
• 23:41   Re: [HACKERS] Unlock the vacuum The Hermit Hacker
• 23:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] S_LOCK reduced contention through backoff patch ocie@paracel.com