Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()
Date
Msg-id 199804300242.WAA01472@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()
List pgsql-hackers
>
> On Wed, 29 Apr 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > No reason for the exec().  I believe the only advantage is that it gives
> > us a separate process name in the 'ps' listing.  I have looked into
> > simulating this.
>
>     Under FreeBSD, there is:
>
> setproctitle(3) - set the process title for ps 1
>
>     This isn't available under Solaris though, last I checked...

Not even BSDI, which is BSD 4.4 like FreeBSD.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brett McCormick
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] removing the exec() from doexec()