Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers-win32]

21 July 2004

• 03:40   win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Magnus Hagander
• 03:53   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Magnus Hagander
• 03:59   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Bruce Momjian
• 09:20   Borland c++ compile problems... Steve Holdoway
• 10:08   Re: Borland c++ compile problems... Bruce Momjian
• 10:40   FAT or NTFS on W2k chips42
• 11:09   Re: Borland c++ compile problems... Steve Holdoway
• 14:00   Re: FAT or NTFS on W2k Justin Wyer
• 14:56   Re: FAT or NTFS on W2k Magnus Hagander
• 15:23   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Claudio Natoli
• 18:05   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Magnus Hagander
• 19:26   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Andrew Dunstan
• 21:05   Re: Borland c++ compile problems... Bruce Momjian
• 21:06   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Magnus Hagander
• 21:10   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Andreas Pflug
• 21:20   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Bruce Momjian
• 21:31   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Magnus Hagander
• 21:47   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Andreas Pflug
• 21:58   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Dave Page
• 22:22   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Andrew Dunstan
• 22:24   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Andrew Dunstan
• 22:41   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Dave Page
• 22:42   Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc Andreas Pflug
• 23:10   [Fwd: Re: FAT or NTFS on W2k] chips42