Mailing lists [pgsql-general]

4 July 2014

• 00:00   Re: C++ Background Workers? Tom Lane
• 00:07   Why does autovacuum clean fewer rows than I expect? Nick Cabatoff
• 00:10   Re: C++ Background Workers? Quinlan Pfiffer
• 00:35   Re: Why does autovacuum clean fewer rows than I expect? Tom Lane
• 01:42   Re: Why does autovacuum clean fewer rows than I expect? Nick Cabatoff
• 02:46   Re: Why does autovacuum clean fewer rows than I expect? Michael Paquier
• 02:50   Re: Why does autovacuum clean fewer rows than I expect? Nick Cabatoff
• 02:51   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore David Wall
• 02:54   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore David Wall
• 03:00   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore John R Pierce
• 03:06   which odbc version (32 or 64 bit) should be installed in Client ? sunpeng
• 03:08   which odbc version (32 or 64 bit) should be installed in Client ? sunpeng
• 03:11   Re: which odbc version (32 or 64 bit) should be installed in Client ? sunpeng
• 03:13   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore Bosco Rama
• 03:14   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore Bosco Rama
• 03:16   Re: which odbc version (32 or 64 bit) should be installed in Client ? Rodrigo Gonzalez
• 03:17   Re: which odbc version (32 or 64 bit) should be installed in Client ? Adrian Klaver
• 03:18   Re: which odbc version (32 or 64 bit) should be installed in Client ? Adrian Klaver
• 03:30   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore David Wall
• 03:34   Re: which odbc version (32 or 64 bit) should be installed in Client ? sunpeng
• 03:44   Re: which odbc version (32 or 64 bit) should be installed in Client ? John R Pierce
• 04:01   Re: which odbc version (32 or 64 bit) should be installed in Client ? sunpeng
• 04:26   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore Bosco Rama
• 07:12   Re: NOT IN and NOT EXIST Sameer Kumar
• 07:26   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore David Wall
• 08:13   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore Bosco Rama
• 08:44   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore David Wall
• 08:51   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore David Wall
• 09:41   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore Jacob Bunk Nielsen
• 10:27   Re: Migration error " invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xff " from mysql 5.5 to postgresql 9.1 Albe Laurenz
• 12:12   Re: Migration error " invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xff " from mysql 5.5 to postgresql 9.1 sunpeng
• 12:21   Re: Migration error " invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xff " from mysql 5.5 to postgresql 9.1 John R Pierce
• 12:52   Re: Migration error " invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xff " from mysql 5.5 to postgresql 9.1 Albe Laurenz
• 14:47   Re: Windows releases - Bundle OpenSSL includes and .libs in the installer? Craig Ringer
• 16:24   Random-looking primary keys in the range 100000..999999 Kynn Jones
• 17:13   Re: Random-looking primary keys in the range 100000..999999 hubert depesz lubaczewski
• 17:19   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore Tom Lane
• 17:49   Re: Random-looking primary keys in the range 100000..999999 Kynn Jones
• 17:59   Re: Random-looking primary keys in the range 100000..999999 Tom Lane
• 18:55   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore David Wall
• 21:30   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore Bosco Rama
• 21:43   index contains unexpected zero page at block error François Beausoleil
• 21:55   Re: pg_dump slower than pg_restore Bosco Rama
• 23:33   Query "top 10 and others" Edson Richter