Mailing lists [pgsql-general]

22 July 2001

• 06:39   Re: VACUUM ANALYZE Ben-Nes Michael
• 07:01   Re: VACUUM ANALYZE Ben-Nes Michael
• 08:36   Planner estimates cost of 'like' a lot lower than '='?? Mats Lofkvist
• 09:48   Re: Planner estimates cost of 'like' a lot lower than '='?? Buddy Lee Haystack
• 10:37   Re: How Postgresql Compares... Count(*) and others Bruno Wolff III
• 11:01   Re: Planner estimates cost of 'like' a lot lower than '='?? Mats Lofkvist
• 11:39   Re: VACUUM ANALYZE Tom Lane
• 12:13   Re: Planner estimates cost of 'like' a lot lower than '='?? Tom Lane
• 13:31   Re: SQL Regular Expression Question missive@frontiernet.net (Lee Harr)
• 14:36   Re: Planner estimates cost of 'like' a lot lower than '='?? Mats Lofkvist
• 15:29   Re: Planner estimates cost of 'like' a lot lower than '='?? Tom Lane
• 15:44   Re: Planner estimates cost of 'like' a lot lower than '='?? Tom Lane
• 16:04   Re: SQL Regular Expression Question Joel Burton
• 16:16   Re: Planner estimates cost of 'like' a lot lower than '='?? Mats Lofkvist
• 17:17   Re: Planner estimates cost of 'like' a lot lower than '='?? Mats Lofkvist
• 18:01   psql on red hat 7.1 newsreader@mediaone.net
• 18:14   Re: Planner estimates cost of 'like' a lot lower than '='?? Tom Lane
• 18:29   Re: psql on red hat 7.1 teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 18:45   Re: Planner estimates cost of 'like' a lot lower than '='?? Mats Lofkvist
• 19:01   Re: Planner estimates cost of 'like' a lot lower than '='?? Tom Lane
• 19:06   Re: Copy and serial type problem missive@frontiernet.net (Lee Harr)
• 20:30   Re: psql on red hat 7.1 Justin Clift
• 21:51   Re: psql on red hat 7.1 newsreader@mediaone.net
• 22:47   Re: psql on red hat 7.1 Tom Lane
• 23:26   RE: Application Design and PostgreSQL Willis, Ian (Ento, Canberra)
• 23:49   Re: psql on red hat 7.1 newsreader@mediaone.net