Re: VACUUM ANALYZE - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ben-Nes Michael
Subject Re: VACUUM ANALYZE
Date
Msg-id 010b01c1129a$91087a40$aa5796d4@canaan.co.il
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VACUUM ANALYZE  (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>)
Responses Re: VACUUM ANALYZE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Nope im using 2.2.18 but ill recompile it to enable debug and return with
the error

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki@canaan.co.il>
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM ANALYZE


> "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki@canaan.co.il> writes:
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0  0x4014d8e0 in ?? ()
> > #1  0x8123a52 in ?? ()
> > #2  0x8123a9f in ?? ()
> > #3  0x8123caa in ?? ()
> > [ etc ]
>
> Sigh, that's no help at all :-(.  Looks like you are using a postgres
> executable that's been stripped of all symbolic information.  Don't
> suppose you want to compile from source to make a more debuggable copy?
>
> Actually, maybe it's not quite no help at all.  I'm going to guess from
> the numeric values that the core dump is occurring in a system library
> (since the top address is so far different from the rest).  Since this
> is a vacuum analyze, and since it's on a redhat machine, I'm going to
> leap to a conclusion: maybe you are running into the known strcoll()
> bug.  Are you running glibc earlier than 2.2.3?  If so, an update to
> 2.2.3 may fix it.  See the thread at
>
> http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1021209
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--------------------------
Canaan Surfing Ltd.
Internet Service Providers
Ben-Nes Michael - Manager
Tel: 972-4-6991122
http://sites.canaan.co.il
--------------------------



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: How Postgresql Compares... Count(*) and others
Next
From: "Ben-Nes Michael"
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM ANALYZE