Mailing lists [pgsql-bugs]

17 June 2011

• 03:29   Re: Behaviour of triggers on replicated and non replicated tables Luiz K. Matsumura
• 03:48   Re: Behaviour of triggers on replicated and non replicated tables Luiz K. Matsumura
• 06:21   BUG #6063: compatability issues Praveen
• 07:39   BUG #6064: != NULL, <> NULL do not work Michael Pilling
• 07:43   Re: BUG #6064: != NULL, <> NULL do not work Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
• 08:18   BUG #6066: Bad string in German translation causes segfault (user-triggerable) Christoph Berg
• 08:22   Re: BUG #6066: Bad string in German translation causes segfault (user-triggerable) Bernd Helmle
• 08:42   Re: BUG #6066: Bad string in German translation causes segfault (user-triggerable) Heikki Linnakangas
• 09:11   Re: BUG #6066: Bad string in German translation causes segfault (user-triggerable) Christoph Berg
• 09:38   Ident authentication fails due to bind error on server (8.4.8) Marinos Yannikos
• 11:10   Re: BUG #6066: [PATCH] Mark more strings as c-format Christoph Berg
• 13:49   BUG #6065: FATAL: lock 0 not held Ben
• 13:51   Re: could not read block XXXXX in file "base/YYYYY/ZZZZZZ": read only 160 of 8192 bytes Антон Степаненко
• 14:20   Re: BUG #6064: != NULL, <> NULL do not work Kevin Grittner
• 14:22   Re: BUG #6066: [PATCH] Mark more strings as c-format Alvaro Herrera
• 14:28   Re: BUG #6065: FATAL: lock 0 not held Tom Lane
• 15:41   Re: Ident authentication fails due to bind error on server (8.4.8) Tom Lane
• 15:57   Re: could not read block XXXXX in file "base/YYYYY/ZZZZZZ": read only 160 of 8192 bytes Kevin Grittner
• 16:19   Re: could not read block XXXXX in file "base/YYYYY/ZZZZZZ": read only 160 of 8192 bytes Merlin Moncure
• 16:53   Re: could not read block XXXXX in file "base/YYYYY/ZZZZZZ": read only 160 of 8192 bytes Антон Степаненко
• 17:24   Re: could not read block XXXXX in file "base/YYYYY/ZZZZZZ": read only 160 of 8192 bytes Merlin Moncure
• 17:52   Re: Ident authentication fails due to bind error on server (8.4.8) Tom Lane
• 18:48   Re: Behaviour of triggers on replicated and non replicated tables Robert Haas
• 19:49   Re: could not read block XXXXX in file "base/YYYYY/ZZZZZZ": read only 160 of 8192 bytes Антон Степаненко
• 20:34   Re: could not read block XXXXX in file "base/YYYYY/ZZZZZZ": read only 160 of 8192 bytes Merlin Moncure
• 20:47   Re: could not read block XXXXX in file "base/YYYYY/ZZZZZZ": read only 160 of 8192 bytes Антон Степаненко
• 20:53   Re: could not read block XXXXX in file "base/YYYYY/ZZZZZZ": read only 160 of 8192 bytes Merlin Moncure