Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From PFC
Subject Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
Date
Msg-id op.tt4n3aldcigqcu@apollo13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle  (Andreas Kostyrka <andreas@kostyrka.org>)
Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle  (John Meyer <john.l.meyer@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
> 2. Oracle, Microsoft, and IBM have a "lot" to fear in the sense of a
> database like PostgreSQL. We can compete in 90-95% of cases where people
> would traditionally purchase a proprietary system for many, many
> thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of dollars.

    Oracle also fears benchmarks made by people who don't know how to tune
Oracle properly...

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
Next
From: Andreas Kostyrka
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle