Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From John Meyer
Subject Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
Date
Msg-id 4677472F.9020806@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle  (PFC <lists@peufeu.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
List pgsql-advocacy
PFC wrote:
>
>> 2. Oracle, Microsoft, and IBM have a "lot" to fear in the sense of a
>> database like PostgreSQL. We can compete in 90-95% of cases where
>> people would traditionally purchase a proprietary system for many,
>> many thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of dollars.
>
>     Oracle also fears benchmarks made by people who don't know how to
> tune Oracle properly...
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>       match
>
Then Oracle fears its users, which explains the "no-benchmark" policy,
which I cannot see any PR honk being able to spin that in any way that
doesn't make Oracle look like it's hiding its head in the sand.


--
The NCP Revue -- http://www.ncprevue.com/blog


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Chris Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: The Business Case for PostgreSQL
Next
From: "Jonah H. Harris"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle