Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andreas Kostyrka
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
Date
Msg-id 4676C5DE.7010101@kostyrka.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle  (PFC <lists@peufeu.com>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



PFC wrote:
>
>> 2. Oracle, Microsoft, and IBM have a "lot" to fear in the sense of a
>> database like PostgreSQL. We can compete in 90-95% of cases where
>> people would traditionally purchase a proprietary system for many,
>> many thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of dollars.
>
>     Oracle also fears benchmarks made by people who don't know how to
> tune Oracle properly...

Well, bad results are as interesting as good results. And this problems
applies to all other databases.

Andreas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGdsXdHJdudm4KnO0RArTkAKCZs6ht4z0lb2zHtr5MfXj8CsTZdQCgmwE5
JAD6Hkul1iIML42GO1vAM0c=
=FMRt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle
Next
From: Guy Rouillier
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [PERFORM] [ADMIN] Postgres VS Oracle