On 3/27/22 4:51 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> I think it's worth thinking about the roles which for a timeboxed period
> requires an investment in time frequently matching that of an FTE (like CFM and
> RMT). Thats admittedly a very arbitrary measurement, but I think in general
> the discussion could be worth having, if only to settle on what we have today
> being the preferred option.
Agreed. I think it's worth having.
For my personal opinion, I'm generally in favor of this idea, but I'll
chime in on the -docs/-hackers thread (wherever you think is best to
have it).
Jonathan
