> On 27 Mar 2022, at 01:37, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/26/22 7:41 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 27 Mar 2022, at 00:35, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> $subject basically. They volunteer to take on a management role that doesn't tend to be popular and the added
recognitionseems warranted. I would suggest listing them only until we publish the release they were a manager for and
thenwe memorialize their role in the major version as part of its history and start the listing anew. That limits the
sizeto around 6.
>> While I'm not on the contributor committee, I do think this idea has merits.
>> Personally I would expand scope to also list the RMT for similar reasons.
>
> I think there are a few things here.
>
> For specifically being listed on the contributors page, that would be a discussion for the contributor committee, as
Danielsays (contributors@postgresql.org).
Absolutely agree.
> For the release notes, that's likely a discussion on -hackers/-docs in terms of how we would want to denote that. I
knowthat Peter spends a fair bit of time compiling the list of all contributors to a major release for the release
notes,though we haven't broken out folks on their roles in that (outside of who authored a feature).
I think it's worth thinking about the roles which for a timeboxed period
requires an investment in time frequently matching that of an FTE (like CFM and
RMT). Thats admittedly a very arbitrary measurement, but I think in general
the discussion could be worth having, if only to settle on what we have today
being the preferred option.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
