> On 28 Mar 2022, at 16:53, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>
> On 3/27/22 4:51 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> I think it's worth thinking about the roles which for a timeboxed period
>> requires an investment in time frequently matching that of an FTE (like CFM and
>> RMT). Thats admittedly a very arbitrary measurement, but I think in general
>> the discussion could be worth having, if only to settle on what we have today
>> being the preferred option.
>
> Agreed. I think it's worth having.
>
> For my personal opinion, I'm generally in favor of this idea, but I'll chime in on the -docs/-hackers thread
(whereveryou think is best to have it).
Agreed. David, being the OP on the thread, please raise this on -hackers
(probably the best audience) or -docs so we can discuss this in a wider group.
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
