Re: SQL/JSON features for v15 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: SQL/JSON features for v15
Date
Msg-id d29e076b-d7b8-9bb1-4eef-d4e22d7ff1c2@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL/JSON features for v15  (Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: SQL/JSON features for v15
List pgsql-hackers
On 2022-09-01 Th 09:54, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
>
> On 31.08.2022 23:39, Nikita Glukhov wrote:
>
>> And here is a quick POC patch with an example for COPY and float4
> I decided to go further and use new API in SQL/JSON functions 
> (even if it does not make real sense now).
>
> I have added function for checking expressions trees, special
> executor steps for handling errors in FuncExpr, CoerceViaIO, 
> CoerceToDomain which are passed through ExprState.edata.
>
> Of course, there is still a lot of work:
>   1. JIT for new expression steps
>   2. Removal of subsidary ExprStates (needs another solution for 
>     ErrorData passing)
>   3. Checking of domain constraint expressions
>   4. Error handling in coercion to bytea
>   5. Error handling in json_populate_type()
>   6. Error handling in jsonb::type casts
>   7. ...
>
>
> Also I have added lazy creation of JSON_VALUE coercions, which was 
> not present in previous patches.  It really greatly speeds up JIT 
> and reduces memory consumption.  But it requires using of subsidary 
> ExprStates.
>
>
> jsonb_sqljson test now fails because of points 4, 5, 6.




It looks like this needs to be rebased anyway.

I suggest just submitting the Input function stuff on its own, I think
that means not patches 3,4,15 at this stage. Maybe we would also need a
small test module to call the functions, or at least some of them.

The earlier we can get this in the earlier SQL/JSON patches based on it
can be considered.

A few comments:


. proissafe isn't really a very informative name. Safe for what? maybe
proerrorsafe or something would be better?

. I don't think we need the if test or else clause here:

+   if (edata)
+       return InputFunctionCallInternal(flinfo, str, typioparam,
typmod, edata);
+   else
+       return InputFunctionCall(flinfo, str, typioparam, typmod);

. I think we should probably cover float8 as well as float4, and there
might be some other odd gaps.


As mentioned previously, this should really go in a new thread, so
please don't reply to this but start a completely new thread.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: more descriptive message for process termination due to max_slot_wal_keep_size
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Use pg_pwritev_with_retry() instead of write() in dir_open_for_write() to avoid partial writes?