Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id c94d0ddb-d7f8-84be-46a2-8eb569561948@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 14/02/2019 16:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> ... so, have we beaten this topic to death yet?  Can we make a decision?
> 
> Personally, I'd be happy with either of the last two patch versions
> I posted (that is, either AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] or
> AS [MATERIALIZE [ON|OFF]] syntax).  But we gotta pick something.

If we're not really planning to add any more options, I'd register a
light vote for MATERIALIZED.  It reads easier, seems more grammatically
correct, and uses an existing word.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL insert delay settings
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY support for parameters