Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id 11919.1550157089@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
... so, have we beaten this topic to death yet?  Can we make a decision?

Personally, I'd be happy with either of the last two patch versions
I posted (that is, either AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] or
AS [MATERIALIZE [ON|OFF]] syntax).  But we gotta pick something.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Evgeniy Efimkin
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] CREATE SUBSCRIPTION with FOR TABLES clause (table filter)
Next
From: Adrian Phinney
Date:
Subject: COPY support for parameters