Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Karlsson
Subject Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date
Msg-id 1dc97df0-61d2-1426-8d0a-6dd61a4b88a6@proxel.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 14/02/2019 16.11, Tom Lane wrote:
> ... so, have we beaten this topic to death yet?  Can we make a decision?
> 
> Personally, I'd be happy with either of the last two patch versions
> I posted (that is, either AS [[NOT] MATERIALIZED] or
> AS [MATERIALIZE [ON|OFF]] syntax).  But we gotta pick something.

I am happy with either of those.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: pg11.1: dsa_area could not attach to segment
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq host/hostaddr/conninfo inconsistencies