On 6/13/20 10:03 PM, Niels Jespersen wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I just found out about the pg service file.
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/libpq-pgservice.html
>
> I don’t know why it took me so long finding this. I have been looking
> for ways to abstract physical details of data location away for clients
> (much like Oracle’s tnsnames).
>
> Want to move a cluster to a new host. Sure, move it, edit
> pg_service.conf and clients will not know the difference.
>
> It works great for at least psql and psycopg2.
>
> But I cannot find anything on pg_service.conf and the Postgres ODBC
> driver and Npgsql for .Net
>
> I know pg_service.conf support is implemented through libpq and support
> for rivers not using libpq is not a given thing.
>
> But I think the need for the abstraction of connection details is a
> general one.
>
> Can anyone shed som light on the ubiquitousness of support for
> pg_service.conf?
>
> Are there any other mechanisms with broader support, that can be used
> instead of pg_service.conf (if support is scarce beyond what builds on
> libpq)?
Only thing I know of is something like
pgbouncer(http://www.pgbouncer.org/) where you keep a constant
connection setting for the pooler and then change the settings for the
database(s) it connects to.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards Niels Jespersen
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
