Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order
Date
Msg-id b42b73150805080716u28b172b9od65bf640cf954681@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order  ("Aleksej Saushev" <asau@inbox.ru>)
Responses Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order
List pgsql-bugs
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> This brings up a good question.  Exactly how do users know what format
> _binary_ is?  int4 is network byte order, but what about int8, float4,
> inet?

This is exactly what libpqtypes solves.  Not only do we handle
formatting of binary formats, we provide a level of protection from
internal format changes for libpq users.  See the example here:
http://libpqtypes.esilo.com/.  So, documentation of binary formats
(including network byte ordering) are not required.

merlin

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Chernow
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order