Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order
Date
Msg-id 200805081534.m48FYWR26563@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order  (Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Aleksej Saushev wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> This brings up a good question.  Exactly how do users know what format
> >> _binary_ is?  int4 is network byte order, but what about int8, float4,
> >> inet?
> >
> > This is exactly what libpqtypes solves.  Not only do we handle
> > formatting of binary formats, we provide a level of protection from
> > internal format changes for libpq users.  See the example here:
> > http://libpqtypes.esilo.com/.  So, documentation of binary formats
> > (including network byte ordering) are not required.
>
> No, it is still required. There's not a single reference to libpqtypes
> in Postgres documentation, and libpqtypes isn't part of the distribution,
> if I understand it right.

Agreed.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order
Next
From: Andrew Chernow
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order