>> Yes, I'm planning to try to do the minimum possible damage to the current
>> API to fix the issue.
>
> What's your thought there? Afaics it's infeasible to do the flushing tat
> the fd.c level.
I thought of adding a pointer to the current flush structure at the vfd
level, so that on closing a file with a flush in progress the flush can be
done and the structure properly cleaned up, hence later the checkpointer
would see a clean thing and be able to skip it instead of generating
flushes on a closed file or on a different file...
Maybe I'm missing something, but that is the plan I had in mind.
--
Fabien.
