On 2016-01-07 12:50:07 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >But more importantly: You designed the API to be generic because you
> >wanted it to be usable for other purposes as well. And for that it
> >certainly needs to deal with that.
>
> Yes, I'm planning to try to do the minimum possible damage to the current
> API to fix the issue.
What's your thought there? Afaics it's infeasible to do the flushing tat
the fd.c level.
Andres
