Re: Indication of db-shared tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: Indication of db-shared tables
Date
Msg-id a5abf2be8583405342acc3d4b16b427f@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Indication of db-shared tables  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Indication of db-shared tables
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> Do we do enough to show which tables are db shared, e.g. pg_database?  I
> don't see any indication from psql \dS.  Are our docs clear enough?

I don't think \dS should be indicating such a thing. I think it's documented 
well enough: if you are doing something that it matters enough which 
tables are shared, you really oughtta know about them anyway.

- -- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201106212323
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAk4BYF8ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjOYACgnDq27MbRCg4Dr7QL/p6tq1kj
3EwAoPnJCqazL+akS1Au5WoxB5RvceDu
=RpBk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP pgindent replacement
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users