Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users
Date
Msg-id 201106220325.p5M3PLg20516@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Discussion seems to have ended on this thread without a clear direction.
> 
> I still think the right thing is to just use a non-default port number.
> That gets 90% of the benefit for 10% of the work of any other approach
> (except for the ones for which the ratio is even worse).

I agree.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Indication of db-shared tables
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on both win32 and Unix