Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users
Date
Msg-id 16662.1308712253@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Discussion seems to have ended on this thread without a clear direction.

I still think the right thing is to just use a non-default port number.
That gets 90% of the benefit for 10% of the work of any other approach
(except for the ones for which the ratio is even worse).
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Indication of db-shared tables
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.2] DROP Reworks Part.0 - 'missing_ok' support of get_object_address