Re: Indication of db-shared tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Indication of db-shared tables
Date
Msg-id 1308723116-sup-3180@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Indication of db-shared tables  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
Responses Re: Indication of db-shared tables
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Greg Sabino Mullane's message of mié jun 22 03:24:34 UTC 2011:
> 
> Hash: RIPEMD160
> 
> > Do we do enough to show which tables are db shared, e.g. pg_database?  I
> > don't see any indication from psql \dS.  Are our docs clear enough?
> 
> I don't think \dS should be indicating such a thing. I think it's documented 
> well enough: if you are doing something that it matters enough which 
> tables are shared, you really oughtta know about them anyway.

Yeah.  The user can't create new ones either, so why would it matter?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dan McGee
Date:
Subject: pg_upgrade version check improvements and small fixes
Next
From: David Christensen
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP pgindent replacement