Sorry Tom, Somone had not put the reply to header in correctly......
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Peter Childs <peterachilds@gmail.com>
Date: 12-Sep-2006 10:16
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] COPY FROM command v8.1.4
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On 11/09/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Mr. Dan" <bitsandbytes88@hotmail.com> writes:
> > We have a table with 12028587 records in it.
> > We do a COPY TO file of the records for this table.
> > We count the number of records in the file, it has 12028587 lines.
> > We do a COPY FROM that file into a table with identical structure as the
> > first table.
> > We count the number of records in the second table and there are only
> > 12028538 records.
>
> Try dumping the second table with COPY TO and diff'ing the dump files
> to get more detail about what's missing.
>
> If you repeat the entire experiment, are the same records missing each
> time? I'm wondering about flaky hardware as much as anything.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
I presume your doing a select count(*) from table not reading the
stats from vacuum verbose or pg_class....
I know it sounds stupid but its a common mistake and vacuum is only a guess
Peter Childs
