Re: varchar vs text columns - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Lew
Subject Re: varchar vs text columns
Date
Msg-id ZbCdnTkmkddcZjjbnZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@comcast.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: varchar vs text columns  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
List pgsql-admin
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:33:54AM -0700, Jessica Richard wrote:
>> What is the difference between varchar and text for a string column?
>> What is the benefit of using each one?
>> Is text better than varchar performance wise?
>
> From the manual:
>
>     Tip:  There are no performance differences between these
>     three types, apart from the increased storage size when using
>     the blank-padded type. While character(n) has performance
>     advantages in some other database systems, it has no such
>     advantages in PostgreSQL. In most situations text or
>     character varying should be used instead.
>
> Note that varchar(n) will have a performance effect, because on
> insert or update you have to check to make sure the input doesn't
> exceed the specified length.

See also Peter Koczan's reply in the '"_" in a serach  pattern' thread.

--
Lew

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: tech@g-sistemas.com
Date:
Subject: Set up a database without backup
Next
From: PostgreSQL Admin
Date:
Subject: Re: deinstallation - reinstallation on Mac OS 10.4