Re: varchar vs text columns - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: varchar vs text columns
Date
Msg-id 20070723191115.GI9196@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to varchar vs text columns  (Jessica Richard <rjessil@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: varchar vs text columns  (Lew <lew@lewscanon.nospam>)
List pgsql-admin
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:33:54AM -0700, Jessica Richard wrote:
> What is the difference between varchar and text for a string column?
> What is the benefit of using each one?
> Is text better than varchar performance wise?

From the manual:

    Tip:  There are no performance differences between these
    three types, apart from the increased storage size when using
    the blank-padded type. While character(n) has performance
    advantages in some other database systems, it has no such
    advantages in PostgreSQL. In most situations text or
    character varying should be used instead.

Note that varchar(n) will have a performance effect, because on
insert or update you have to check to make sure the input doesn't
exceed the specified length.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to.  That actually seems sort of quaint now.
        --J.D. Baldwin

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Jessica Richard
Date:
Subject: varchar vs text columns
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: varchar vs text columns