Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Daniel Westermann (DWE)
Subject Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures
Date
Msg-id ZR0P278MB010531F3376F873D0F2FC8E9D2FA0@ZR0P278MB0105.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-docs
Hi Bruce,

>On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 07:15:29PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>>
>> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/plpgsql-overview.html
>> Description:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> since PostgreSQL 11 we have procedures, so referencing to only functions
>> here seems to ignore that. Shouldn't procedures be mentioned here as well?

>Good point.  It seems PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python, PL/Tcl, and SPI
>server-side languages all support procedures.  I have developed the
>attached patch to mention procedures right at the top.  I didn't see a
>need to mention function "or procedure" throughout the entire document.
>Does this seem sufficient?

Thanks for looking at it. Seems you attachment is corrupt, at least I can not open it. Can you please resend?

Regards
Daniel


pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Functions should be Functions & Procedures