On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:23:44PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> >On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 07:15:29PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> >> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >>
> >> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/plpgsql-overview.html
> >> Description:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> since PostgreSQL 11 we have procedures, so referencing to only functions
> >> here seems to ignore that. Shouldn't procedures be mentioned here as well?
>
> >Good point. It seems PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python, PL/Tcl, and SPI
> >server-side languages all support procedures. I have developed the
> >attached patch to mention procedures right at the top. I didn't see a
> >need to mention function "or procedure" throughout the entire document.
> >Does this seem sufficient?
>
> Thanks for looking at it. Seems you attachment is corrupt, at least I can not open it. Can you please resend?
It is a gzipp'ed file. I had to use gzip and can't resend it since it
contains the T-C-L URL that is flagged by Spamhaus as spam and causes my
emails to be marked as spam. You can see the patch here:
https://momjian.us/tmp/proc.txt
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
