>On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:23:44PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
>> Hi Bruce,
>>
>> >On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 07:15:29PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> >> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>> >>
>> >> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/plpgsql-overview.html
>> >> Description:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> since PostgreSQL 11 we have procedures, so referencing to only functions
>> >> here seems to ignore that. Shouldn't procedures be mentioned here as well?
>>
>> >Good point. It seems PL/pgSQL, PL/Perl, PL/Python, PL/Tcl, and SPI
>> >server-side languages all support procedures. I have developed the
>> >attached patch to mention procedures right at the top. I didn't see a
>> >need to mention function "or procedure" throughout the entire document.
>> >Does this seem sufficient?
>>
>> Thanks for looking at it. Seems you attachment is corrupt, at least I can not open it. Can you please resend?
>It is a gzipp'ed file. I had to use gzip and can't resend it since it
>contains the T-C-L URL that is flagged by Spamhaus as spam and causes my
>emails to be marked as spam. You can see the patch here:
Looks good, thanks.
Regards
Daniel
