On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 08:29:43PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> It's really not great that 7f3e17b4827 disabled randomization without even a
> comment as to why...
This story is on this thread, with some processes not able to start:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/BD0D89EC2438455C9DE0DC94D36912F4@maumau
> There actually seems to have been a lot of work in that area. See 617dc6d299c
> / bcbf2346d69 and as well as the retrying in 45e004fb4e39. Those weren't
> prevented by us disabling ASLR.
Indeed. 45e004f looks like the most interesting bit here. FWIW, I
would not mind re-enabling that on HEAD, as of something like the
attached. I have done a dozen of runs without seeing a test failure,
and knowing that we don't support anything older than Win10 makes me
feel safer about this change. Any objections?
--
Michael
